Carlynton considers options for outdated internet access |

Carlynton considers options for outdated internet access

Administrators at Carlynton are happy with the improved PSSA scores.

Connecting to the internet or sending an email is as easy as a click of a button.

Joshua Jones, Carlynton’s supervisor of information technology, would like to keep it that way throughout the district. Jones informed school board members that the district’s computerized system is working well, but that it’s main infrastructure is well past its prime years.

District officials will have a few decisions to make regarding the core switch of the computer system. Carlytnon has secured more than $25,000 in reimbursement from the E-rate program for the core project and access points.

Jones said the main focus would be replacing the core switch, which received a reimbursement of $20,430. The overall cost of replacing the core and access points after the E-rate would be nearly $81,000.

The E-rate program is administered by the Universal Service Administrative Company under the direction of the FCC. The program helps schools and libraries obtain affordable broadband. The reimburse rate for school districts is based mainly on the free and reduced lunch program.

Jones said the core switch is nine years old and is used to service all district buildings. The equipment, he said, has a life expectancy between five and seven years. In addition, the district does not have a service agreement on the main device.

If the core switch fails, Jones said the district would be without internet service and students would not be able to access Google Docs.

“There are no signs that it will fail soon, but we need to act on this in a timely manner,” Jones said.

Board members discussed a possible five-year lease to spread out payments but have not made a final decision.

Categories: Local | Carlynton
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.