ShareThis Page
Carnegie officials seek traffic flow improvement | TribLIVE.com
Carnegie/Bridgeville

Carnegie officials seek traffic flow improvement

967262_web1_WEB-traffic-signal.jpeg

Carnegie leaders are working to improve traffic patterns and signaling at the intersection of Jefferson and West Main streets at the entrance to the borough’s downtown business district.

Traffic signals were put in at the intersection in 2010, and technology has improved since then, borough Manager Steve Beuter said.

The borough in 2018 received a $22,640 Green Light-Go grant from the state Department of Transportation. The borough will contribute $4,528.

The Jefferson Street Optimization Project will tackle a need for “infrastructure repairs, signage upgrades, and improved timing implementation,” according to a funding commitment letter from Beuter.

Borough leaders in the past have received comments that the light lasts too long, Beuter said.

The goal is to “improve functionality of the traffic patterns and signals” he said.

Borough council members on March 11 accepted a proposal for engineering services from Trans Associates Engineering Consultants Inc. in an amount not to exceed $8,300 for a traffic analysis and signal revisions of the intersection.

The traffic study will take between six and eight weeks to complete, Beuter told council members.

Categories: Local | Carlynton
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.