John Oyler: The Whiskey Rebellion festivals of 2019 |

John Oyler: The Whiskey Rebellion festivals of 2019

In this file photo, Bob Spisak of Ross, known as “Bob the Juggler,” performs during the Whiskey Rebellion Festival in Washington, Pa., on July 11, 2015.

Two hundred and twenty-five years ago, the brand-new United States government faced its first major domestic crisis.

A large group of farmers in Western Pennsylvania rose up in opposition to an onerous excise tax on the production of whiskey, threatening armed rebellion. We have been aware of this momentous event for many years, but continue to be eager to learn more about it.

Fortunately, there are a number of local organizations dedicated to enhancing our understanding of this significant bit of our heritage, primarily in the form of memorial festivals. Thanks to fortuitous scheduling, this year we were able to spend two weekends in July enjoying these festivals.

The first weekend was in “little” Washington, which has staked its claim on being the focal point of the rebellion on its favorite son, David Bradford. The festival is always rewarding; this year was no exception. It features a series of realistic reenactments of Whiskey Rebellion events by the “Historical Street Theater” on South Main Street in downtown Washington.

This year, we were particularly impressed by a confrontation between John Neville and John Holcroft which clearly defined the issues that led to the rebellion.

The Washington festival includes live music concurrently in three venues, with genres including archaic, Celtic, bluegrass and contemporary folk.

My final stop was at the Pioneer Room of the George Washington Hotel where I was delighted to find Andrew Knez Jr. with a table of his masterful artwork. Andrew is indeed a treasure as the contribution that he continues to make to our understanding of life two centuries ago is immense.

The following weekend, my focus shifted to Woodville Plantation. I have enjoyed their reenactments of the events at Bower Hill in the past. This year, they were supplemented by “Market Faire,” a recreation of an 18th century community market. This turned out to be even more impressive than I had anticipated.

No 18th century fair would be complete without a medicine show. This one featured Dr. Balthasar, impeccably portrayed by re-enactor Mike Follin. Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton also was there. Impersonated by re-enactor Pete Fernbaugh, Hamilton convincingly presented the federal government’s rationale for the Excise Tax of 1791.

The entertainment included Jack and Maddie’s Turnip Wagon, a curio show featuring marionettes, hobby horses and period songs. In addition, fiddler Zac Gordon provided a selection of 18th century tunes, accompanied by a tap-dancing puppet.

A variety of wares were available from an impressive group of peddlers. Willy Frankford displayed the products of his remarkable scrimshaw work on powder horns and other historical artifacts. The Liberty Pole Spirits distillery offered seven different whiskeys. Others sold period clothing, antique reproductions and blankets.

Although I had seen the reenactment of the burning of Bower Hill before, it was a treat to see it again. Even though you know it is all make-believe, reenactments do an excellent job of providing contemporary viewers with a rough idea of what actually occurred.

It was a treat to see the recreation of an 18th century market. Our congratulations to Dan Ragaller and all the Neville House Associates folks for making it happen. I certainly hope this is the first event of an annual series.

Categories: Local | Carlynton
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.