ShareThis Page
Aspinwall sewer project delayed until spring |
Fox Chapel

Aspinwall sewer project delayed until spring

Tawnya Panizzi
| Friday, January 11, 2019 11:04 a.m
Aspinwall has pushed back to spring a sewerage project along Eastern Avenue. Area sewage authorities are under a state and federal mandate to create long-range plans for controlling sewer overflows during heavy rain events.

A $550,000 sewer line project along Eastern Avenue in Aspinwall has been pushed back to spring.

Council on Wednesday night said it hoped to get a jump on the prep work but decided it would be more efficient to wait for consistent temperatures.

“We wanted to try to do some of it while it’s been nice,” administrative assistant Brian Corey-O’Connor said. “But this way, we won’t have to keep closing and reopening roads.”

Work is expected to alleviate overflow problems along Eastern Avenue by separating the storm and sewer lines.

Installation of a separate line will reduce the amount of water flowing into the Allegheny County Sanitary Authority (Alcosan) sewage plants through the borough’s current combined system, Borough Manager Melissa Lang said.

The project will target Third Street to Freeport Road.

Lang said the majority of the project will be paid with a $433,000 grant from Alcosan. Money will come through the GROW program, or Green Revitalization of Our Waterways.

Alcosan created the GROW program in 2016 and has since awarded grants totaling $18 million for 59 projects across the region.

In all, the projects are expected to reduce the amount of overflows into the Allegheny River and other local waterways by about 109 million gallons.

Tawnya Panizzi is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tawnya at 412-782-2121, ext. 2, or via Twitter @tawnyatrib.

Tawnya Panizzi is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tawnya at 412-782-2121 x1512, or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Fox Chapel
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.