Blawnox cracking down on code violations |
Fox Chapel

Blawnox cracking down on code violations

Tawnya Panizzi
Dan Speicher | Tribune-Review
Blawnox officials are cracking down on code violations like high grass.

Blawnox code enforcement will have extra teeth thanks to an ordinance recently approved by council.

The Quality of Life law is meant to enable Code Enforcement Officer Mallori McDowell to crack down on time-sensitive issue like high grass, trash and snow removal.

“The biggest problem we had was that the process takes a long time once I notify someone of a violation,” McDowell said. “It could be months before you went to the judge.”

The new guidelines will require much swifter action, she said.

McDowell canvasses the borough looking for and responding to violations.

When she sees trash cans left out for days or weeds growing knee-high, she will issue a courtesy door-hanger to alert the offender.

“If it’s trash or grass, it can get bad quickly. We don’t want our neighbors putting up with that,” McDowell said. “You don’t want garbage sitting out in the heat.”

Indoor furniture on lawns is a big problem too, she said.

Residents have 24 hours to correct a problem or they get a $25 ticket. If the issue goes uncorrected or if the resident gets a second notice within a year and it goes unresolved, the cost climbs to $50. Cost is $100 after the third ticket, and, if the issue persists, McDowell writes a citation that goes to a district judge.

The borough follows the International Property Maintenance Code,, which McDowell said is a valuable tool that lacks urgency for time-sensitive violations.

“The new process will deter people from getting lax,” she said.

Tawnya Panizzi is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tawnya at 412-782-2121 x1512, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Fox Chapel
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.