Blawnox manager resigns; council appoints familiar face to interim position |
Fox Chapel

Blawnox manager resigns; council appoints familiar face to interim position

Tawnya Panizzi
Blawnox tax collector Kathy Ulanowicz has been appointed acting manager.

Blawnox manager John Stinner has resigned, just after celebrating his second year with the borough.

It was an abrupt departure which necessitated an emergency council meeting for members to decide how to move forward.

“John accepted a position as manager at Jefferson Hills that is a closer commute to his home,” council President Deb Laskey said.

Tax collector and borough secretary Kathy Ulanowicz was appointed acting manager.

Ulanowicz, a longtime borough employee and lifelong resident, put her name in the hat during council’s debate on how to fill the vacancy.

She was appointed to the interim position because, Laskey said, Ulanowicz is instrumental in day-to-day municipal operations and she worked alongside Stinner on upcoming projects.

She works well with the public and is committed to the community, Laskey said.

“As members of council, we felt that she was qualified and a decision was made to promote from within,” Laskey said.

The position runs through December.

At that time, council will evaluate her progress and make a decision whether to conduct a search or promote Ulanowicz to borough manager.

Ulanowicz has worked for the borough since August 2008.

“I am thankful for the opportunity and the confidence borough council has entrusted me with,” she said. “I look forward to continuing to work with the residents and businesses to make Blawnox the best it can be.”

Tawnya Panizzi is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tawnya at 412-782-2121 x1512, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Fox Chapel
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.