Fox Chapel 12U boys make the most of play in Cooperstown |
Fox Chapel

Fox Chapel 12U boys make the most of play in Cooperstown

Tawnya Panizzi
The Fox Chapel Foxes 12 U played against 60 other teams in Cooperstown New York at the Cooperstown All-Star Village. The Foxes ranked 33rd in pool play.

A triple play in Cooperstown, New York will be among the highlights for the Fox Chapel 12U boys baseball team which competed this week in a national tournament at the home of the Baseball Hall of Fame.

“The underdog role motivated the team and, after a slow start, we hit full stride,” Coach Chad O’Brien said. “We topped off with an improbable 11-2 win against a team from Maryland that was seeded No. 2 out of 60 teams.”

The Foxes traveled to All Star Village in Cooperstown to compete against top-ranked teams from across the United States and Canada.

The all-star team was selected in October and has been training together since in preparation for this week.

O’Brien said that going against some of the top teams in the country, the team’s motto since the start has been, “why not us?”

The team is currently 3-3 and is heading into the elimination rounds this weekend.

Pictured are coaches Frank Pistella, Nate Geller, Chad O’Brien and Brad Krushinski, along with players Franco Pistella, Joey Geller, Rowan O’Brien, Blake Krushinski, Brady Johnston, Matthew Begg, Troy Susnak, James Gaghan, Daniel Kwiatkowski, Antonio LeDonne, Nicolas Squeglia and Jeremy Haigh.

Tawnya Panizzi is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tawnya at 412-782-2121 x1512, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Fox Chapel
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.