ShareThis Page
Fox Chapel trails ready for spring despite heavy flood damage in 2018 |
Fox Chapel

Fox Chapel trails ready for spring despite heavy flood damage in 2018

Tawnya Panizzi
Trails and roads in Fox Chapel sustained heavy damage during the 2018 summer floods.

Fox Chapel walking trails will be open in time for spring hikes despite sustaining major damage during the 2018 summer floods, officials announced Friday.

“We sustained a tremendous amount of damage during the July floods and continued rainy weather,” Mayor Alex Scott said. “I want to thank our public works department, who have been working to get our parks and trails back in shape.”

Clean-up costs were estimated at about $400,000 across the municipality.

The July 2 storm washed away part of the Squaw Run trail and deposited piles of rocks and mud at McCahill Park.

Scott said several trail stewards trekked out regularly onto debris-strewn paths to survey damage and report conditions back to borough administrators.

In all, July’s three-day heavy rainfall not only wiped out several trails but also tore away guiderails on Squaw Run Road, downed trees along Hunt Road and eroded bridge edges throughout the borough.

Scott said there is still work to be done to make sure trails are ready for spring weather. He said crews are clearing downed trees on the new Riding Meadow bypass trail.

Trail maps are available at the municipal office along Fox Chapel Road.

Tawnya Panizzi is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tawnya at 412-782-2121 x1512, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Fox Chapel
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.