Grant allows Fox Chapel to hold sewer fees steady |
Fox Chapel

Grant allows Fox Chapel to hold sewer fees steady

Tawnya Panizzi
Fox Chapel held its sewer rates steady this year but will pass an ALCOSAN increase to residents.

Fox Chapel officials were able to stave off an increase in the borough’s sanitary sewer fees this year, thanks to a grant awarded in late 2018.

Rates will hold steady, with residents paying $4.66 per 1,000 gallons plus a fee of $60 a year.

Finance Director Joy Hardt said residents will incur a 7 percent rate increase for ALCOSAN fees, from $6.91 to $7.42 per 1,000 gallons.

There also is an increase in the ALCOSAN fee from $14.51 to $15.60 per quarter.

The borough in 2018 earned a $658,417 Green Revitalization of Our Waterways (GROW) grant from ALCOSAN. Money was awarded as reimbursement for pipe lining that reduced groundwater infiltration. Work was done from 2014-17.

Specifically, work included 19,300 feet of manhole-to-manhole lining to the ALCOSAN point of connection along Squaw Run.

“These grant funds will offset additional pipe lining projects mandated by Department of Environmental Protection (DEP),” Hardt said.

Tawnya Panizzi is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tawnya at 412-782-2121, ext. 2, [email protected] or via Twitter @tawnyatrib.

Tawnya Panizzi is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tawnya at 412-782-2121 x1512, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Fox Chapel
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.