Newcomer bumps incumbent from Sharpsburg council in primary | TribLIVE.com
Fox Chapel

Newcomer bumps incumbent from Sharpsburg council in primary

Tawnya Panizzi
1192156_web1_web-elections
Tribune-Review file

A newcomer appears to have bumped an incumbent from Sharpsburg council, according to unofficial primary results from the Allegheny County Elections Bureau.

Adrianne Laing was one of four Democrats seeking the party’s nomination for three four-year seats on council.

Laing was the top vote-getter in the May 21 primary, receiving 248 votes.

Coming in a close second was incumbent Jon Jaso, with 229 votes. Earning the third nomination was incumbent Greg Domian, with 191 votes.

The trio edged out incumbent Larry Trozzo, who got 133 votes.

Trozzo is a two-term councilman who serves as the borough’s planning and zoning chairperson. The retiree is an active member of the Sharpsburg Volunteer Fire Department.

There were no Republicans on the ticket.

Barring a strong write-in campaign, winners will be guaranteed a seat on council following November’s general election.

Laing is a 15-year resident of the borough who served several months on council in 2017 to fill a vacancy. She has volunteered with the District Association and Sharpsburg Environmental Advisory Council.

“I am excited to bring my passion for listening to people, helping them and finding creative solutions to council,” she said.

Domian said he was thankful for the win and looks forward to helping Sharpsburg with its continued revitalization.

“Our town continues to grow at a rapid pace,” he said. “As chairman of the personnel committee, I will closely monitor the borough infrastructure with a proactive approach ensuring a smooth transition as we move forward.”

Jaso also was appreciative of earning the chance to continue serving on local government. He said his main focus will be determining what is best for the borough.

“It may not always be the most popular, but it will be what’s best,” he said.

That includes making sure riverfront development comes with minimal negative impact on the community, he said.

“I also want to make sure that the residents know that they have someone that is looking out for them and their families,” Jaso said.

Other Lower Valley municipalities had only uncontested races.

In O’Hara, two Republican candidates were vying for two open seats. The terms each run four years and represent the township at-large.

Winners are incumbents John Denny of Woodshire Drive, who was first elected to council in 2009; and Bob Smith of Dorseyville Road, who is council president and has served 30 years.

In Fox Chapel, three Republican candidates competed for three seats. Each term runs four years.

Winners are incumbents Ann Meyer of Guyasuta Road, James Royston of Catalpa Ridge Road and Jay Troutman of Riding Trail Lane.

In Blawnox, three Democratic incumbents each will see another four-year term.

They are John Simmons of Freeport Road, first appointed to council in 2017, Katie Coban of Freeport Road, who is a three-term councilwoman, and Elaine Palmer of Summit Drive, who was appointed to fill a council vacancy in 2018.

In Aspinwall, three incumbents will return to council along with one newcomer.

Winners are Democratic incumbent Jeff Harris of Second Street, Democratic newcomer Heth Turnquist of Eastern Avenue and Republican incumbents Tim McLaughlin of Lexington Avenue and David Borland of Third Street.

Tawnya Panizzi is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tawnya at 412-782-2121 x1512, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Fox Chapel
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.