ShareThis Page
Fox Chapel

Aspinwall's new mayor Ted Sheerer can't accept position

Tawnya Panizzi
| Thursday, Dec. 21, 2017, 2:24 p.m.

Aspinwall will have a new mayor in 2018, but it won't be Ted Sheerer even though he won the election in November.

Sheerer was supposed to replace the retiring Joe Giuffre after running unopposed in the primary and general elections.

Just five days short of taking office, longtime resident Sheerer said his employer at a new job prohibits him from serving in a public office.

Sheerer works in the banking industry and accepted a job early in December with an employer he declined to name.

Unaware of the policy, he filed an appeal with the employer's ethics office but was denied.

Sheerer declined to comment further, other than to say he is disappointed not to be able to work with council. He promised to remain an active and engaged resident.

Borough solicitor Steve Korbel said council will need to appoint a mayor, likely in January or February. Council will need to discuss whether it will accept applications or be responsible for choosing a successor.

“The appointment will happen within 30 days of the office being declared vacant,” Korbel said.

Council meets at 6:30 p.m. Jan. 2 for its reorganization meeting and at 7 p.m. Jan. 10 for a regular session.

A longtime council member in the 1990s, Sheerer reemerged this year with the issue of Eastern Avenue reconstruction. The Mosites Co., developers of a proposed commercial project called Riverfront 47 that stretches along the Allegheny River from Aspinwall to Sharpsburg, asked for the reconstruction of Eastern at Freeport Road to create a better entrance to the site. The proposal was taken off the table because of complaints by residents.

Sheerer joined a contingent of 10 former borough elected officials who petitioned council to conduct a community survey to assess public opinion on the project.

Tawnya Panizzi is a staff writer for the Tribune-Review. Reach her at 412-782-2121, ext. 2, or @tawnyatrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me