ShareThis Page
Fox Chapel

Foxwall EMS earns state grant for equipment

Tawnya Panizzi
| Thursday, Feb. 8, 2018, 3:57 p.m.
Foxwall EMS received a state grant to help purchase new equipment.
Foxwall EMS received a state grant to help purchase new equipment.

Foxwall EMS was awarded a $7,037 state grant that will be used to buy equipment for its roster of 27 paid and volunteer staff.

Cmdr. Josh Worth said the money is crucial because the volunteer group depends on community donations and insurance reimbursements to operate.

“As a nonprofit organization without government funding, we rely heavily on receiving grants and donations to keep the service running and financially stable,” Worth said.

The grant was made available through the state Emergency Management Agency and Office of the State Fire Commissioner. The money is part of awards of more than $179,000 to 16 volunteer fire and ambulance companies.

Chief of Operations Rick Duffy said low subscription returns and increased costs have caused the service to dip into its savings to meet financial needs.

Founded in 1978, Foxwall provides advanced life support ambulance service to Fox Chapel and Aspinwall, as well as mutual aid to other communities in the area.

The service receives about $30,000 in municipal tax dollars each year.

Foxwall has operating expenses of about $300,000 a year, Duffy said.

Leaders were hoping to replace one of its two ambulances in 2018 but that was postponed to 2022.

Foxwall has two ambulances, one purchased in 2008 and one in 2013. A new vehicle will cost about $180,000.

Tawnya Panizzi is a staff writer for the Tribune-Review. Reach her at 412-782-2121, ext. 2, or via Twitter @tawnyatrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me