ShareThis Page
Fox Chapel

Survey on Riverfront 47 trail design closes Thursday

Tawnya Panizzi
| Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2018, 1:06 p.m.
Riverfront 47 developers are seeking public input on the park and trail design.
submitted
Riverfront 47 developers are seeking public input on the park and trail design.

Tomorrow is the last day to submit input on the park and trail design at Riverfront 47, the property that stretches 1.5 miles from Aspinwall to Sharpsburg along the Allegheny River.

Developers are soliciting opinion through an online survey at riverfront47.com. It is also available at aspinwallriverfrontpark.org and friendsoftheriverfront.org. Paper copies are available at the Sharpsburg municipal building along Main Street.

The land will connect the Three Rivers Heritage Trail to points in Etna and O’Hara.

The survey asks a few questions regarding use of the trail and amenities that people might desire, including live performances, basketball, yoga and fishing. Developers also are curious how often people might visit the trail and what mode of transportation they’ll use to get there.

“As we embark on designing a riverfront park and trail that will be treasured and used by all, your input is important in guiding the design process,” a message on the Riverfront 47 website said.

Designers Noemie Lafaurie-Debany and Javier Gonzalez-Campana of Balmori will spearhead the project.

“We look forward to working with the communities to design all-ages venues that serve neighbors and visitors alike and provide a place to encourage local economic development,” Lafaurie-Debany said.

“The Allegheny is beautiful, the native vegetation strong and well grown. There is such potential for the site.”

Tawnya Panizzi is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tawnya at 412-782-2121, ext. 2, tpanizzi@tribweb.com or via Twitter @tawnyatrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me