ShareThis Page
Shaler Area students shine in Japanese speech contest | TribLIVE.com
Hampton/Shaler

Shaler Area students shine in Japanese speech contest

1037822_web1_sj-japanese-042519
Submitted
Shaler Area High School students Kylie Dougherty, Jenna Facer, Evan Baldwin, Mai Swendsen, Marcus Katich and Nathan Hayward earned top awards in the 22nd annual High School Japanese Speech Contest.

Shaler Area High School students took top awards in the 22nd annual High School Japanese Speech Contest at the University of Pittsburgh.

The Japan-America Society of Pennsylvania and the University of Pittsburgh’s Asian Studies Center host the Japanese Speech Contest at Pitt’s Oakland Campus each year for Japanese learners of all levels. This year, 52 students from schools throughout western Pennsylvania participated in the competition that includes four speech levels and a poster contest.

In the Advanced Plus level, senior Kylie Dougherty placed second and senior Marcus Katich placed third. In the Advanced level, junior Nathan Hayward earned first place and junior Evan Baldwin earned third place. In the Intermediate level, Jenna Facer, a sophomore, placed third, and in the Beginner level, freshman Mai Swendsen placed third.

Students are required to memorize a speech on the chosen topic for the speech contest or make a trifold poster for the poster session. The Shaler Area students who participated in the competition wrote and memorized a speech in Japanese about food in Japan at the Intermediate to Advanced Plus level, and a self-introduction at the Beginner level.

Categories: Local | Hampton_Shaler
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.