Shaler hires new police officer |

Shaler hires new police officer

Erica Cebzanov | For the Tribune-Review
New Shaler Township Police Department Officer William English III shakes hands with Chief Bryan Kelly at the March 12 commissioners meeting.

A new police officer is joining the Shaler Township department’s staff of 26 officers.

The Shaler commissioners March 12 hired William English III. The township’s Civil Service Commission sanctioned English’s employment.

English is replacing officer Gregory Steinmetz, who is retiring in May after 28 years of service, Lt. Sean Frank said.

The starting salary for English’s position is $54,370.

English worked more than 17 years as a City of Pittsburgh officer, serving as a patrolman for five years, then working his way up to sergeant and lieutenant. According to English, he spent five years as a member of the department’s crisis and hostage negotiations team and two years providing instruction in firearms, fitness, emergency vehicle operations and other areas at the Allegheny County Police Academy.

From 1991 through 1995, he was a military policeman in the Marine Corps.

English said he applied for the Shaler position because of the positive things he had heard about the department from former City of Pittsburgh officers who now work at Shaler.

“I’m really looking forward to the opportunity to work in a smaller township and for a department that seems to be very service- and community-oriented,” said the 46-year-old who grew up in Bellevue.

“I enjoy working with the public and dealing with a wide variety of situations.”

English’s wife, Laura, attended the commissioners meeting.

Categories: Local | Hampton_Shaler
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.