ShareThis Page
Hampton/Shaler

Senior legacy gifts a Hampton tradition

| Monday, May 29, 2017, 9:00 p.m.

Seniors have a tradition of giving back to their peers through a legacy gift – this year's being two water bottle refilling stations.

Senior student council representatives reported the 2017 Legacy Gift at a May 1 school board meeting.

The water stations were purchased for approximately $3,000 and are already in place, said Kevin Green, a teacher at Hampton and advisor to the student council. He said the legacy gift demonstrates the seniors wanting to give back to their fellow students.

When money remains from fundraising and other events over the course of the year, the seniors give back instead of spending it on themselves. The senior class and student council come up with ideas to benefit the school – probably something the district wouldn't think to purchase, said Green

“It's something they want to leave behind,” said Green. “It's their money, so to speak.

Last year's gift was a sound system for dances and other events that can be used for other needs in the high school, he said.

The water refillable stations are located in the cafeteria and in the hall.

Previous years' legacy gifts include benches and microwaves. Green said he's impressed how the seniors spend time discussing and weigh price options when mulling over what to buy, sometimes rejecting items deemed too expensive.

“It's kind of funny because they sound like their parents,” said Green, a Hampton High teacher for 26 years. “I think they've made some pretty good decisions.”

Natalie Beneviat is a Tribune-Review contributor.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me