ShareThis Page
Hampton/Shaler

Hampton officials pleased with new EMS service

| Tuesday, March 6, 2018, 2:18 p.m.
Hampton officials pleased with response times by Shaler Hampton Emergency Medical Services.
Hampton officials pleased with response times by Shaler Hampton Emergency Medical Services.

Hampton Council was given an update on a variety of township issues at its recent Feb. 28 meeting, including on the status of its new partnership with the Shaler-Hampton Emergency Medical Services.

The Shaler-Hampton EMS received 127 calls to 911 for service in January, and of those calls they answered 118, according to Joe Johnson, manager of the EMS.

For those calls not answered, it was because all three of the ambulances were already out on a call, said Johnson.

Christopher Lochner, municipal manager for the township, said it comes to 7 percent of missed calls. He compared it to the missed calls by the former Hampton EMS, which was Hampton's preferred provider last year, which would occasionally average around 28 percent missed in a month.

The new EMS has a full-time Advanced Life Support ambulance located in Hampton Township, and two ambulances at their Shaler location. The service is also the preferred provider for Etna.

The service averaged a response time of 9.4 minutes in January, said Johnson. This is measured from when a dispatch call is received to the time the service arrives at the site of the emergency, he said.

Additionally, Lochner said the Shaler-Hampton EMS were aware the calls not abled to be answered were being covered by mutual aid. So far, officials are pleased with the new partnership.

“Hopefully, that will continue for multiple years to come,” said Lochner.

Alex Zarenko, director of community services for Hampton Township, said they met with the EMS regarding early planning for Hampton's July 3 festivities and he was very pleased.

“I'm going to feel real good about this year,” he said.

• In other council news, Jerry Speakman, controller to the township, advised the council that the township had already used much of this year's salt supply. Last year, there was a surplus due to milder weather in 2017.

This year “we're going to be much more in line with budget” as far as purchasing goes.

“That's OK. We had a nice little break last year. That's not going to happen this year,” he said.

Zarenko said there is enough in reserve for any more snow that might come this year.

Like many other municipalities, Hampton is in a joint purchasing program for salt with 18 other members of the North Hills Council of Governments, according to the NHCOG website. The local governments share in the cost and supply of the multi-municipal road salt contract.

Hampton also has a cooperative purchasing agreement with Pennsylvania's COSTARS program, said Lochner.

Both of these agreements require a municipality to purchase a minimum of 80 percent of what township projected for that year.

Lochner said the township passed its minimum for this year.

Last year, the township also saved money because the COSTARS agreement let it out of its 80 percent minimum purchasing requirement, saving $113,000, he said.

Additionally, the agreements lets a municipality purchase up to 120 percent of what it projected, if necessary.

• Lochner discussed the upcoming clean-up day on March 24, 8 a.m. to noon, weather permitting. Volunteers are welcome to join staff collecting garbage along roads in Hampton.

Roads will be assigned to individuals or groups, and vests, gloves and bags will be provided. For details, go to the township website at: www.hampton-pa.org.

Natalie Beneviat is a Tribune-Review contributor.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me