ShareThis Page
Hampton/Shaler

Aquinas Academy student headed to 2018 Pennsylvania National Geographic State Bee

| Tuesday, March 20, 2018, 12:33 p.m.
Jillian Mercer
Jillian Mercer

Aquinas Academy eighth-grader Jillian Mercer has been notified by the National Geographic Society that she is one of the semifinalists eligible to compete in the 2018 Pennsylvania National Geographic State Bee. The contest will be held at The State Museum of Pennsylvania in Harrisburg on April 6.

This is the second level of the National Geographic Bee competition, which is now in its 30th year. School bees were held in schools with fourth- through eighth-grade students throughout the state to determine each school champion. Having also won in 2015 and 2017, Jillian established herself as the only three-time Aquinas Academy geographic bee champion.

As the school champion, Jillian then took a qualifying test, which was submitted to the National Geographic Society.

The National Geographic Society has invited up to 100 of the top-scoring students in each of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Department of Defense Dependents Schools and U.S. territories to compete in the state bees. This is the third time that Jillian has qualified to compete in the state bee.

Jillian also has shown her prowess in history, advancing to the regional competition (held at major cities instead of by state to determine who advances to the national competition) for the National History Bee, This will be held for the Pittsburgh region on April 10.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me