ShareThis Page

No exceptions: Gateway School Board says first-grader must leave district

Samson X Horne
| Wednesday, Feb. 1, 2017, 10:24 a.m.
Kamdyn Biddle and her mother, Katy.
Kamdyn Biddle and her mother, Katy.

When Gateway first-grader Kamdyn Biddle's father died in September, her mother wanted her to remain at Cleveland Steward Elementary School.

After all, Katy Biddle concluded, her daughter had made friends there and was meeting daily with a guidance counselor. The death of Kamdyn's father from a brain disease was traumatic enough for the girl; Biddle wanted to keep her daily school routine normal.

But Biddle went to stay with family in Murrysville, as it was difficult to remain in the Monroeville home where her husband died and she needed help caring for her 9-month-old twins.

The Gateway School Board, however, ruled last week that Kamdyn can no longer attend Steward.

“I'm devastated. It's upsetting, and I feel awful for (Kamdyn),” Biddle said. “I understand there's a policy, but I know they can make an exception. I can't fathom why it has to come to this.”

She said she initially spoke to Steward Principal Michael Jack about the situation and he said staying at Steward until the end of the school year was fine.

“Since I still owned our home (in Monroeville) and paid taxes, he told me it was no big deal to finish the year,” Biddle said.

Jack failed to return two telephone messages for comment.

But when Biddle attended a parent-teacher conference Jan. 26, the school's secretary handed her a letter from Gateway Superintendent William Short stating her daughter's last day of school would be Jan. 30.

Board member Chad Stubenbort said the board during an executive session following a committee meeting last week chose to uphold Short's decision.

Stubenbort said he strongly opposed the decision. Other board members refused to comment. Short said in an email that he could not comment on the Biddle case but said school policy and state code requires a student to live in the district.

The board also referenced a policy which states students must live within the district with a resident parent or legal guardian.

But Stubenbort said Katy Biddle passed the “litmus test” for someone to be considered a Gateway resident, because she provided a mortgage agreement, driver's license, and proof of taxes and utility bills paid from an address within the district.

“It was ignorant for (other board members) not to know their policy,” Stubenbort said.

Board member Stephanie Byrne, though, said the policy defines residency as “where you lay your head at night.” She said others have been turned away after attempting to keep their children in the schools after moving out of the district.

“Letting (Kamdyn) stay after we didn't let others is unfair and goes against policy. If you don't lay your head here, you're not a resident,” she said.

According to the Pennsylvania Department of Education, “Acceptable documents to establish residency include a deed, a lease, utility bills, vehicle registration, driver's license or Dept. of Transportation identification card.”

And it adds: “The district should be flexible and reasonable as to what is required.”

Katy Biddle said she's being penalized for doing the right thing — telling the district administration about her situation.

“I wanted to be honest and upfront. I didn't want to game the system, and I didn't want this situation to happen,” she said.

Stubenbort added that he didn't think the mother's request for her daughter to finish the school year was asking for too much.

“Here's a parent that's obviously involved in parent-teacher conferences, pays taxes, still owns a home in the district, brings her daughter to school every day and there's no extra burden on taxpayers for (Kamdyn) to stay at the school. I just don't get it,” Stubenbort said.

Samson X Horne is a staff writer for the Tribune-Review. Reach him at 412-320-7845 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me