ShareThis Page

Monroeville doubles paving budget; did your street make the list?

Dillon Carr
| Wednesday, May 9, 2018, 4:25 p.m.
Sign outside Monroeville municipal building.
Sign outside Monroeville municipal building.

Monroeville council has more than doubled the amount it originally allocated for its repaving program.

Contractors will repair 31 miles of 70 municipal roads for $1.9 million. There will also be nine miles of unnamed roads to be paved.

Council approved $800,000 for road work when it passed its budget in December. Then, in March, council agreed to transfer about $1 million from the fund balance in an effort to get caught up on road repairs.

The municipality has fallen behind in maintaining its 110 miles of roads and 34 parking lots.

"We should be doing about seven miles of roads per year," said Paul Hugus, the municipality's engineering director in March. "And that's just to keep pace. And we are about 50 miles behind where we should be."

Council unanimously approved awarding a bid to Wampum-based Young Blood Paving Inc. for paving the roads and to O'Hara-based Russell Standard Corporation for seal coating.

Council awarded the bids to the two companies despite them coming in around $100,000 more than they agreed to spend in March.

Hugus said that's because of higher fuel prices at the pump.

"We don't want to fall behind anymore," said Councilman Eric Poach.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2325, or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me