ShareThis Page

Monroeville balks at supporting citizen-led legislative redistricting proposal

Dillon Carr
| Wednesday, June 13, 2018, 11:21 a.m.
Sign outside Monroeville municipal building.
Sign outside Monroeville municipal building.

Monroeville Council delayed voting last week on a resolution expressing support for a statewide initiative to change Pennsylvania's legislative redistricting process.

The measure urges the state Legislature to establish, via a voter referendum, the Citizens Commission for Legislative and Congressional Redistricting, which would be responsible for redrawing senate and congressional lines following the 2020 Census.

Groups such as Fair Districts PA are advocating for redistricting changes. Doug Webster, 75, of Monroeville, a spokesperson for the statewide group, told council at a recent meeting that governments must team up to tell legislators they want redistricting reform.

“We're building the evidence that Pennsylvanians support change,” he said.

Webster was bewildered after council's decision to delay what he sees as a no-brainer.

“When you talk about gerrymandering, people understand it and they think it's wrong,” Webster said. “I'm mystified as to what is controversial about that.”

Monroeville Councilman Eric Poach, who motioned to table the resolution, said after the meeting he wants more time to review the issue.

“It sounds too important to just make an uninformed decision,” he said.

Deputy Mayor Greg Erosenko voted against delaying the vote.

“That is a political issue. I don't believe (council) should get involved with anything political. That's not our job,” he said. “Our job is to deal with the municipality, the residents, public safety, our roads — the whole nine yards. That is a political statement, and I don't believe it's in our job purview.”

Council's next voting meeting is July 10.

According to Fair District PA's website, 277 governments, including cities, boroughs and counties have passed similar resolutions supporting the initiative. Another 164 are in progress.

In Allegheny County, seven cities and boroughs have passed resolutions and 13 are in progress.

The state Senate was on track early last week to send to the House its highly debated bill that would create the 11-member citizens commission. The legislature and governor would appoint members. Most debate on the bill was devoted to an amendment, which seeks to elect appellate judges by regional district, instead of statewide.

Webster said he hopes legislators in both chambers can pass a bill by mid-July to have a commission set up to draw the new district lines after the 2020 Census.

If that happens, the state's constitution requires the bills to pass again in both chambers. The earliest Pennsylvanians could vote on the changes would be in 2019's general election, he said.

“But the proponents would want a vote in 2020 because that's a presidential election,” Webster said.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2325, or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me