ShareThis Page
Monroeville

DUI, drug cases among those recently handled by Judge Herbst in Monroeville

Michael DiVittorio
| Thursday, June 28, 2018, 2:45 p.m.
Pixabay

Monroeville District Court Judge Jeffrey Herbst handled these cases recently. Defendants will have court dates set in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas. Charges were filed by Monroeville police unless otherwise noted.

Held for court

• Pearl Margaret Banks, 46, of Monroeville on charges of driving under the influence, public drunkenness and driving with a suspended license. Charges were filed Feb. 24.

Waived preliminary hearings

• Darrell Carr, 28, of Pitcairn on charges of driving under the influence, driving without a license, driving over divider, careless driving, reckless driving and two counts of duties at stop sign. Pitcairn police filed the charges April 14.

• Monique Shari Matthews, 22, of Pittsburgh on charges of flight to avoid apprehension, possession with intent to deliver and two counts of possession of controlled substances. Allegheny County Sheriff's Office filed the charges on Jan. 24.

• Cody Pile, 28, of Monroeville on charges of driving under the influence. Charges were filed March 19.

• Aliesha Marie Cross, 29, of Dravosburg on charges of disorderly conduct, possession of marijuana, possession of drug paraphernalia, driving without a license and three counts of possession of controlled substances. Pitcairn police filed the charges May 18.

• Craig Allan Schiller, 46, of Dravosburg on charges of disorderly conduct, possession of controlled substances and possession of drug paraphernalia. Pitcairn police filed the charges May 18.

• Heather Lynn Dickson, 33, of Pitcairn on charges of retail theft. Charges were filed Nov. 23.

Dickson went before the judge on another case. She waived a preliminary hearing on charges of theft by deception. Charges were filed Nov. 23.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me