ShareThis Page
Monroeville

Weapons violations, drug cases among those recently handled by Judge Herbst in Monroeville

Michael DiVittorio
| Thursday, July 5, 2018, 5:03 p.m.

Monroeville District Court Judge Jeffrey Herbst handled these cases recently. Defendants will have court dates set in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas. Charges were filed by Monroeville police unless otherwise noted.

Held for court

• Steven Thompson, 21, of Cincinnati on charges of unlawful use of a computer, possession of unlawful device making equipment, making altered access devices, possession of marijuana, possession of drug paraphernalia, no rear lights, two counts of turning movements and required signals, five counts of possession of instruments of a crime and 11 counts of possession of access device knowing it's counterfeit. Charges were filed June 20.

• Raymaley Matthew Jonah, 27, of Harrison City on charges of driving under the influence and reckless driving. Pitcairn police filed the charges April 29.

Waived preliminary hearings

• Jeffrey Robinson, 48, of McKeesport on charges of possession of firearm prohibited, receiving stolen property, possession of offensive weapons, public drunkenness and possession of controlled substances. Charges were filed June 16.

• Marciano Jordan Nesbath, 27, of Pittsburgh on charges of driving under the influence, possession of marijuana, possession of drug paraphernalia, turning movements and required signals, exceeding 55 mph in other locations by 20 mph and careless driving. State police filed the charges April 2.

• Jeremy Sonner, 34, of Carnegie on charges of possession of controlled substances and possession of drug paraphernalia. Pitcairn police filed the charges May 8.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me