ShareThis Page

Monroeville Muncipal Authority in line for nearly $395K in grants for sewer lining projects

Dillon Carr
| Thursday, Oct. 4, 2018, 9:15 p.m.
Monroeville’s municipal building.
Monroeville’s municipal building.

The Monroeville Municipal Authority is set to receive nearly $395,000 in state grants to fund sewage lining projects.

Grants came from the Commonwealth Financing Authority and Allegheny County Sanitary Authority Green Revitalization of Our Waterways program.

Money from CFA included $100,000 for the Simpson Run Lining Project and $99,000 for the Dirty Camp Run sewer project.

Funds from Alcosan included around $102,000 for Simpson Run and $94,000 for a sewer lining project on Woodhaven Drive.

The money will help reimburse the authority for a $1.35 million sewer rehabilitation project, said Joe Storey, MMA Compliance Manager. Construction to re-line 40,400 feet of sewer lines in Monroeville started in June, he said.

The remaining $955,000 for the authority’s project was funded by bonds.

The CFA is a seven-member board that administers funds collected from the state’s natural gas impact fee. The impact fee is an annual fee assessed to new unconventional wells drilled into the Marcellus Shale across the state.

The authority approved projects totaling $1.8 million in Allegheny County in September.

Alcosan developed the GROW grant program in 2017 to reduce sewer system overflows in 32 municipalities, according to its website. The authority is under a federal mandate to cut in half by 2026 the 9 billion gallons of sewage that overflow the area’s sewer system each year and end up in rivers and streams.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me