ShareThis Page

All but two of Monroeville's five ballot questions get approved

Dillon Carr
| Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2018, 11:21 p.m.

Monroeville residents voted Nov. 6 on five ballot questions related to changing the municipality’s home rule charter.

The charter gives Monroeville officials the ability to set up the municipality’s government structure and outlines their authority and limitations. Municipalities that choose home rule can do anything not specifically denied by the state constitution, the General Assembly, or the charter itself.

Below are summaries of each question and the resulting vote, according to unofficial totals from the Allegheny County Elections Division. The results reflect 96 percent of precincts reporting at 11:15 p.m. on Tuesday .

Question 1: Failed

• The amendment grants future Monroeville councils the option to eliminate the elected tax collector role and instead appoint a treasurer to take over tax collection duties. Three councilmen urged voters in their respective wards to cast “no” votes to this question in October because, according to Councilman Steve Duncan, “Essentially, we’re taking away (the voter’s) right to vote for a tax collector.”

• 6,546 “no” votes (57.7%); 4,808 “yes” votes (42.3%)

Question 2: Passed

• The amendment updates the municipality’s purchasing and bidding procedures and exceptions. It also allows the municipality to extend contracts on goods and services. The previous rule required the municipality to enter into a contract for at least a two-year term.

• 6,338 “yes” votes (57.1%); 4,756 “no” votes (42.9%)

Question 3: Passed

• The amendment grants the municipality subpoena powers for out-of-state parties. It also corrects a provision that allowed the municipality to punish parties for ignoring subpoenas by fining or imprisonment. Now, the municipality must follow state law with any infractions it wants to apply.

• 8,217 “yes” votes (73.3%); 2,989 “no” votes (26.7%)

Question 4: Passed

• The amendment makes it so appointees to council seats only need to run to retain their seats during municipal election years. The previous rule stated appointees must run in the next election if he or she wants to serve a full term, which created confusion when Councilman Eric Poach, who was appointed in January to fill a vacancy, appeared on ballots in the 2018 primary. Monroeville sued the Allegheny County elections division over the issue, and a judge ordered the council seat be removed from general election ballots.

• 8,393 “yes” votes (75.%); 2,791 “no” votes (25%)

Question 5: Failed

• The question removes an entire section of the home rule charter that allowed the municipality to remove an elected official from office at a recall election. Recalling has been found to violate the state’s constitution.

• 5,972 “no” votes (57.2%); 4,463 “yes” votes (42.8%)

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me