ShareThis Page
Monroeville

DUI, theft cases recently handled by Judge Herbst in Monroeville

| Thursday, Dec. 20, 2018, 7:15 p.m.

Monroeville District Court Judge Jeffrey Herbst handled these cases recently. Defendants will have court dates set in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas. Charges were filed by Monroeville police unless otherwise noted.

Held for court

  • Seth Repko, 37, of Youngstown on charges of possession of drug paraphernalia. Charges were filed Oct. 25.
  • Jennifer Ruffin, 32, of Penn Hills on charges of theft by deception, conspiracy and retail theft. Charges were filed Oct. 12.
  • Matthew Moore Jr., 23, of Pittsburgh on charges of retail theft and resisting arrest. Charges were filed Nov. 20.

Waived preliminary hearings

  • David Donofrio, 51, of Pitcairn on charges of defiant trespass. Pitcairn police filed the charges Oct. 15.
  • Michael Lynch, 41, of North Versailles on charges of theft by unlawful taking and receiving stolen property. Pitcairn police filed the charges May 30.
  • Teela Madden, 26, of Plum on charges of terroristic threats and fleeing or attempting to elude officers. Charges were filed Nov. 3.
  • Bradford May, 37, of Somerset on charges of driving under the influence, driving without a license, careless driving, reckless driving and exceeding maximum speed limits. State police filed the charges Oct. 4.
  • Brandon Haddaway Sr., 33, of Monroeville on charges of driving under the influence and parking improperly on two way highways. Charges were filed Sept. 4.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me