Assault, theft cases among recent Monroeville police investigations | TribLIVE.com
Monroeville

Assault, theft cases among recent Monroeville police investigations

Michael DiVittorio
1489401_web1_Handcuffs5

Monroeville police filed the following charges July 24-29 in District Judge Jeffrey L. Herbst’s office:

• David Campbell, 40, of Apollo with driving under the influence, possession of controlled substances and possession of drug paraphernalia. Charges were filed July 29 in connection with an incident along Route 22.

• Kim Houston, 54, of Pitcairn with retail theft. Charges were filed July 29 in connection with an incident along the 3600 block of William Penn Highway.

• Natale Titus, 42, of New Kensington with retail theft and defiant trespass. Charges were filed July 29 in connection with an incident along the 3600 block of William Penn Highway.

• Robert Pasquantonio, 65, of Pittsburgh with criminal mischief. Charges were filed July 25 in connection with an incident along the 2600 block of Monroeville Boulevard.

• Garnette Blue, 54, of Monroeville with simple assault and harassment. Charges were filed July 24 in connection with an incident along the 100 block of Cambridge Square.

• Trent Lately, 19, of Monroeville with simple assault. Charges were filed July 24 in connection with an incident along the 1100 block of Princeton Drive.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Monroeville
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.