Drug, DUI cases among those recently handled by Judge Herbst in Monroeville | TribLIVE.com

Drug, DUI cases among those recently handled by Judge Herbst in Monroeville

Michael DiVittorio

Monroeville District Court Judge Jeffrey Herbst handled these cases recently. Defendants will have court dates set in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas. Charges were filed by Monroeville police unless otherwise noted.

Waived preliminary hearings

  • Phillip Ahmad-Revis, 18, of Penn Hills on charges of possession of controlled substances and possession with intent to deliver. Charges were filed March 27.
  • Deshe Thomas, 33, of Pitcairn on charges of reckless driving, driving with a suspended license, accident involving damage to unattended vehicle or property, period for required lighted lamps and two counts of criminal mischief. Pitcairn police filed the charges March 6.
  • Michael Parry, 32, of Monroeville on charges of driving under the influence. Charges were filed Dec. 22.
  • Robin Kaczynski, 58, of Monroeville on charges of driving under the influence, accident involving damage to attended vehicle or property, driving with a blood alcohol content of 0.02 or greater while license is suspended, operating a vehicle without required financial responsibility and failure to stop and five information or render aid. Charges were filed Feb. 4.
  • Dylan Pierce, 19, of Monroeville on charges of fleeing or attempting to elude police, possession with intent to deliver, possession of drug paraphernalia, driving without a license, driving with a suspended license, reckless driving and two counts of possession of controlled substances. Charges were filed March 31.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Monroeville
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.