Drug, theft cases recently handled by Judge Herbst in Monroeville | TribLIVE.com

Drug, theft cases recently handled by Judge Herbst in Monroeville

Michael DiVittorio

Monroeville District Court Judge Jeffrey Herbst handled these cases recently. Defendants will have court dates set in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas. Charges were filed by Monroeville police unless otherwise noted.

Held for court

  • Crystal Jordan, 52, of Pitcairn on charges of tampering with physical evidence, misbrand controlled substances, possession of drug paraphernalia and two counts of possession of controlled substances. Pitcairn police filed the charges April 23.
  • Joseph Grubor, 25, no address given on charges of retail theft and defiant trespass. Charges were filed June 21.
  • Brad Stanek, 35, of Pitcairn on charges of luring a child into a motor vehicle. Pitcairn police filed the charges May 22.
  • John Hudak, 43, of Glassport on charges of theft by unlawful taking and conspiracy. Charges were filed June 3.

Waived preliminary hearings

  • Zachary Roesner, 28, of New Kensington on charges of driving under the influence. Pitcairn police filed the charges April 13.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Monroeville
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.