DUI, theft cases recently handled by Judge Herbst in Monroeville | TribLIVE.com

DUI, theft cases recently handled by Judge Herbst in Monroeville

Michael DiVittorio

Monroeville District Court Judge Jeffrey Herbst handled these cases recently. Defendants will have court dates set in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas. Charges were filed by Monroeville police unless otherwise noted.

Held for court

  • Jeffrey Lockard, 67, of East Liberty on charges of terroristic threats, possession of offensive weapons, recklessly endangering another person, disorderly conduct and public drunkenness.Charges were filed Dec. 10.
  • Damon Walker, 23, of Rankin on charges of retail theft. Charges were filed Sept. 21.
  • Megan Edkins, 31, of Pittsburgh on charges of forgery and theft by unlawful taking. Charges were filed Nov. 8.

Waived preliminary hearings

  • Patricia Coto, 35, of Penn Hills on charges of retail theft. Charges were filed Feb. 18.

Coto also waived preliminary hearings on two other cases, both for retail theft. Those charges were filed Feb. 18.

  • Craig Leith, 32, of Plum on charges of accident involving injury while not properly licensed, possession of controlled substances, possession of drug paraphernalia, driving under the influence, driving without a license and reckless driving. Charges were filed Jan. 26.
  • Brandon Moody-Anderson, 20, of Monroeville on charges of aggravated assault, simple assault and harassment. Charges were filed Feb. 17.
  • Christian Woods, 27, of Turtle Creek on charges of driving under the influence. Charges were filed Jan. 5.
  • Nicole Rozman, 30, of Pittsburgh on charges of retail theft and three counts of conspiracy. Charges were filed Nov. 1, 2017.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Monroeville
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.