Former Monroeville councilman elected to Gateway school board |

Former Monroeville councilman elected to Gateway school board

Dillon Carr
Paul Caliari

A former Monroeville councilman will serve on the Gateway School District Board of Directors, according to unofficial tallies from the Allegheny County Elections Division.

Paul Caliari earned 56.1% of the votes counted compared with opponent Cheryl Boise’s 43.6% with all but two precincts reporting results.

Caliari, a 45-year-old Democrat, will serve an unpaid two-year term to fill former board member Jesse Kalkstein’s seat, which has been filled by Dawn Neilly since the end of July.

Kalkstein resigned July 23 via a letter that was read at the same meeting where Neilly was appointed without public discussion – a move that was criticized as potentially violating the Sunshine Act. She later said she would not seek the Republican nomination to allow for a fair process.

Caliari did not run for re-election for his Ward 5 council seat in 2017, but was one of nine people who applied to fill a Gateway school board vacancy in April 2018. Board member Jack Bova ended up filling that seat.

Caliari will be one of two new faces on the district’s school board, joining Susan Delaney and Scott Gallagher as newcomers. They ran unopposed in the election, along with incumbents Mary Beth Cirucci, Valerie Warning and John Ritter.

Delaney and Gallagher will replace board members George Lapcevich, who failed to earn enough votes in the May primary, and Bova, who sought election on Pitcairn Council.

The county’s unofficial election results do not account for absentee ballots. There were 13 write-in votes and voter turnout in Monroeville sat at 27%.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Monroeville
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.