ShareThis Page
Gateway’s new scoreboard expected to be installed in spring |

Gateway’s new scoreboard expected to be installed in spring

Dillon Carr
The Gateway High School scoreboard at Antimarino Stadium will be replaced with a new one that features a screen capable of displaying videos and space for advertisers.

Gateway School Board is moving forward with the purchase of a new scoreboard on the promise the money will be reimbursed through an agreement with the district’s bus services company.

The board voted 7-2 to purchase the nine-panel scoreboard from OES Inc for $315,000. The money will come from the district’s capital reserve budget. School board members Rick McIntyre and Brian Goppman dissented and expressed concern over how the deal happened.

The board originally decided in April to purchase a $300,000 scoreboard then reneged on the decision in June, opting instead to repair the old one and wait for sponsors to volunteer to fund its replacement.

By November, the district had a sponsor – Student Transportation of America. The school board awarded the bus service company an extended contract through 2026. At the same time, STA said it would pay $315,000 for the scoreboard, prompting members of the public to question if the two deals were somehow linked. District officials denied the claim.

According to the resolution approved Jan. 15, STA will reimburse the district Aug. 1.

Superintendent Bill Short said the district already has begun its search for sponsors who want to advertise on the screen during events.

Short said installation of the scoreboard will start in the spring and it will be ready for use by graduation in June.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Monroeville
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.