Resisting arrest, defiant trespass among cases before Judge Herbst |

Resisting arrest, defiant trespass among cases before Judge Herbst

Dillon Carr

Monroeville District Court Judge Jeffrey Herbst handled these cases recently. Defendants will have court dates set in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas. Charges were filed by Monroeville police unless otherwise noted.

Held for court

• Crystal A. Knopsnider, 28, of Hutchinson on charges of intent to deliver drug paraphernalia, possession with intent to manufacture or deliver, selling a substance resembling drugs, possession of marijuana and the use and possession of drug paraphernalia. Charges were filed June 23.

Waived for court

• Delryce Roberts-Bey, 28, of Verona on a charge of using an access device fraudulently. The charge was filed December 2018.

• Anthony F. Nelson, 65, of Pitcairn on a charge of defiant trespassing and disorderly conduct. The charges were filed Aug. 24 by Pitcairn police.

• Delphon Brown, 23, of Pittsburgh on a charge of resisting arrest. The charge was filed Aug. 22.

• Robert Twigg, 39, of Pittsburgh on charges of retail theft, being in possession of an illegal drug that was not a prescription and using and possessing drug paraphernalia. Charges were filed Aug. 23.

• Brandon Humphrey, 29, of Pittsburgh on charges of criminal trespassing, using an access device fraudulently, theft and receiving stolen property. Charges were filed by Highmark Health police on June 27.

• Daniel Dick, 47, of Pitcairn on charges of theft, receiving stolen property and defiant trespassing. Charges were filed Jan. 25.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Monroeville
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.