Resisting arrest, DUI among cases before Judge Herbst | TribLIVE.com
Monroeville

Resisting arrest, DUI among cases before Judge Herbst

Dillon Carr
1611418_web1_GavelNewN

Monroeville District Court Judge Jeffrey Herbst handled these cases recently. Defendants will have court dates set in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas. Charges were filed by Monroeville police unless otherwise noted.

Waived for court

• Krystal Albitz, 34, of Turtle Creek on charges of resisting arrest, a DUI, public drunkenness and following a vehicle too closely. Charges were filed June 26.

• Ryan M. Hadbavny, 33, of Pittsburgh on two DUIs and one charge of careless driving. Charges were filed June 24.

• Cassie N. Ference, 30, of North Huntingdon on two counts of being in possession of a controlled substance. Charges were filed June 18.

Held for court

• Melony Collingridge, 31, of Plum on charges of being in possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia. Charges were filed April 1.

Nicholas D. Malich, 42, of Monroeville on 13 felonies and six misdemeanors related to sexual and aggravated assault. Charges were filed Oct. 31, 2018. Other charges that included four misdemeanors and a felony related to simple assault and strangulation were also held for court. Those charges were filed Oct. 19, 2018.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Monroeville
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.