Theft cases among those recently handled by Judge Herbst in Monroeville |

Theft cases among those recently handled by Judge Herbst in Monroeville

Michael DiVittorio

Monroeville District Court Judge Jeffrey Herbst handled these cases recently. Defendants will have court dates set in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas. Charges were filed by Monroeville police unless otherwise noted.

Held for court

• Keona Arrington, 21, of Plum on charges of resisting arrest and hindering apprehension/prosecution. Charges were filed Sept. 16.

• James Cepec, 78, of Monroeville on charges of ethnic intimidation, criminal mischief, harassment and defiant trespass. Pitcairn police filed the charges July 8.

• Amir Johnson, 19, of Penn Hills on charges of fleeing or attempting to elude officers, recklessly endangering another person, accident involving damage to unattended vehicle or property, driving with a suspended license, following too closely, reckless driving, failure to notify police of accident involving damage to vehicle/property, driving at unsafe speed, four counts of overtaking vehicle on right, five counts of disregarding traffic lane and five counts of duties at stop sign. Allegheny County Sheriff’s Office filed the charges Aug. 31.

Waived preliminary hearings

• Michele Andrae, 58, of Penn Hills on charges of theft by unlawful taking and unlawful use of a computer. Charges were filed Feb. 3.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Monroeville
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.