Three new faces, one incumbent, in Monroeville council race |

Three new faces, one incumbent, in Monroeville council race

Dillon Carr
Monroeville’s municipal building.
Mayor Nick Gresock (left) swears in Eric Poach to fill vacant Ward 2 council seat in January 2018.
Steven Wolfram
Bob Williams
Domenic Russo

Only one incumbent will seek re-election for Monroeville council while three new faces will vie for two available seats.

All of the candidates are running as Democrats.

Eric Poach is running for re-election after being appointed to fill a vacancy when former Ward 2 Councilman Nick Gresock became mayor.

Steven T. Wolfram is running for Jim Johns’ current seat representing Ward 4. Johns will not run for re-election.

Dominic L. Russo Jr. and Bob Williams are vying for Steve Duncan’s current seat representing Ward 6.

Poach, 60, said his time on council has been “an amazing thing.”

“First and foremost, I want to continue to support public safety and maintain our infrastructure,” he said.

Poach works for UPMC as an emergency preparedness training coordinator and holds degrees from West Virginia University in sports medicine and political science. He also has a master’s degree in public policy from the University of Pittsburgh.

He lives in Monroeville with his wife, Tracey, and together they have two children.

Russo, 67, said he wants to serve on council to address questions residents have about the new fee established under Monroeville’s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System, or MS4.

“With any new fee or ordinance, you’re not going to please everybody, but there are more people up in arms about this than (council) realizes,” Russo said.

Russo, who serves on the municipality’s planning commission, wants to work with officials to make the municipality a place people want to live and work.

He holds an associate’s degree in mechanical engineering from Penn State University and lives with his wife, Patricia, in Monroeville. Together, they raised four children who all graduated from Gateway High School.

Williams, 75, said his platform is simple: He will return phone calls and follow up on issues for residents in Ward 6.

“I just have a desire to serve the residents,” Williams said. “I’ll work to keep our services, like 911, EMS, trash collection, snow removal and our summer parks program, up and running.”

Williams served on Monroeville’s planning commission until 2017 after being on the board for 15 years. He was the board’s chairman for many of those years, he said.

He hopes to keep property taxes under control and wants to work with the school board to make sure it doesn’t keep raising taxes for its residents.

“I’m not real happy on why they raised the taxes. They’ll have to address that. But if we can work them, I’d be more than happy to do that,” Williams said.

Williams, a Gateway High School graduate, lives in Monroeville with his wife, Renee.

Wolfram, 63, a former mail carrier for the U.S. Postal Service, said he has no experience in politics.

“But for 15 years on my (Monroeville) route, I heard everybody complain. ‘Why don’t they do this or that?’ So they asked me if I would ever run (for office). And I started thinking about it,” Wolfram said.

Before his 32-year career with the post office, he served in the military as a medic. He was medically discharged after being injured.

“I just hope maybe I’ll be able to help people out. I’m on a personal level with these people,” he said.

Wolfram has a daughter and grandchild.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Monroeville
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.