ShareThis Page

Delmont, Export propose 2018 budgets with no tax hike

Patrick Varine
| Friday, Nov. 10, 2017, 10:39 a.m.
The Delmont Borough building in June 2015.
Lillian DeDomenic | For the Tribune-Review
The Delmont Borough building in June 2015.

Delmont and Export boroughs have put forth 2018 budget proposals that don't call for tax hikes.

Over the course of two budget workshops, Delmont council members have come up with a budget of just over $1 million, a 0.7 percent increase over the 2017 budget.

Police salaries have increased the past two years, the result of bringing additional full-time officers on board. Consequently, funding for part-time officers — which dropped dramatically from $53,536 in 2016 to just over $15,000 in 2017 — is now projected at just under $11,000.

The numbers may change slightly at Delmont council's regular November meeting where, following an executive session, members will set final salary numbers for borough employees.

That meeting took place after the deadline for this issue.

Delmont residents may also see a $4 increase in their sewage bills, after engineer Kevin Brett laid out the borough's responsibilities under state pollution reduction regulations. That decision has not yet been finalized.

In Export, council members are proposing a $489,200 budget for 2018. With projected revenue of $534,750, if the numbers hold, the borough will see a year-end surplus of more than $45,000.

The borough currently has a fund balance of more than $578,000.

Delmont's local tax rate will remain at 18 mills, where it has been since 2009. Export's local rate will stay at 14 mills, where it has been since being lowered from 16 mills in 2012.

Both local governments will adopt the 2018 budget at their December meetings. That will be Dec. 5 for Export and Dec. 12 for Delmont. Both meetings are at 7 p.m.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2862.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me