ShareThis Page
Murrysville

Murrysville native headed to Montana to document Superfund river clean-up

Patrick Varine
| Friday, April 27, 2018, 12:12 p.m.
The Upper Clark Fork River project clean-up effort is one of the largest Environmental Protection Agency Superfund projects in the nation.
Brennan Linsley/AP
The Upper Clark Fork River project clean-up effort is one of the largest Environmental Protection Agency Superfund projects in the nation.
Gracey Evans, 21, of Murrysville.
BP Miller photo
Gracey Evans, 21, of Murrysville.

A Murrysville native will join a group of environmental photography students from Point Park University as they document cleanup efforts at the largest Superfund site in America.

Franklin Regional alum Gracey Evans will travel to the Upper Clark Fork River project in Missoula, Mont., along with fellow Point Park students, thanks to funding from the Heinz Endowments, which specifically earmarks money for student travel to support the university's environmental journalism program.

“We wanted our students to go to Montana, look at the outward beauty, listen to the people's concerns and understand their environmental challenges,” said Chris Rolinson, associate professor of photojournalism.

Rolinson's students will document a cleanup effort that began in 2012, when the 310-mile Clark Fork of the Columbia River was listed as a Superfund site. Superfund is a United States federal government program designed to fund the cleanup of sites contaminated with hazardous substances and pollutants.

Mining operations that began in the 19th century have resulted in heavy creek pollution, primarily from copper mines.

Evans said she is excited to get started.

“As a photojournalist, I am all about telling stories visually rather than writing,” she said. “I am looking forward to capturing the stories of those affected and what is happening with the Upper Clark Fork River Superfund site. For instance, I believe we're going to talk to a native tribe to see how it's affecting them, since it was their land first.”

The students' work will be collected and edited into a documentary that Rolinson expects will be completed in September.

“For our students, it's not about winning a prize for the film but about helping to directly impact a project in a profound way,” he said. “If our film can re-invigorate interest in the clean-up, our efforts will be well worth it.”

Other students making the trip include Megan Bixler, Amanda Chelosky, Lauren Clouser, Hannah Lapiska, Rebecca Lessner, Ashley Murray, Elana Shahen, Zachary Shahen, Briana Walton, Derek Watson, and Morgan Willis.

Evans said the biggest challenge will be the pressure to produce a film worthy of its subject.

“I know there are some students who are attending who know photography but may not know the elements of how to take good video,” she said. “But of course, we'll all be able to put our talents to good use.”

Rolinson said it's important to continue drawing attention to the site, to ensure clean-up efforts continue.

“This river, while strikingly beautiful, is the largest superfund site in the U.S. It's so big, it will take generations to undo the damage from copper mining, so it's easy to forget about,” he said.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me