Delmont council approves work on borough building |

Delmont council approves work on borough building

Patrick Varine
Tribune-Review file
The Delmont Borough building in June 2015.

Delmont council members are looking to replace aging items in the borough building, a structure described by public works head Bill Heaps as having “the body of a 30-year-old and the insides of a 100-year-old.”

Council voted 5-0 to begin preparing engineering specifications for replacing the building’s aging roof, and took a similar vote to begin replacing windows in the building, which originally served as the Delmont Public School beginning in 1898.

Councilman Bill Marx said an inspection of the roof area revealed no asbestos, which will save the borough some money during its replacement. Marx said the borough’s engineer will begin preparing bid specifications for the project.

Council also will replace what Heaps deemed the 10 worst windows in the building.

“There’s one window in the (accountant’s) office that actually falls out of the frame,” Heaps said. “Thank goodness it’s not on the second floor. We also have windows in the (upstairs) day care that need to be replaced.”

The cost to replace the windows will be roughly $6,800.

The building’s issues are primarily internal. Heaps said the structure itself is in good shape.

“If there was a really bad storm, this is the building you’d want to be in,” he said. “It’s got 3-foot concrete walls.”

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Murrysville
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.