ShareThis Page
Delmont council balks at instituting sewage rate hike | TribLIVE.com
Murrysville

Delmont council balks at instituting sewage rate hike

Patrick Varine
| Tuesday, January 8, 2019 10:45 p.m
618933_web1_WEB-delmont-boroughbldg
Tribune-Review file
The Delmont Borough building in June 2015.

Delmont residents may have to absorb a $2.39 increase from the Franklin Township Municipal Sanitary Authority. For now, however, they do not have to worry about absorbing an additional $7.50 rate hike from the borough.

Council members this week balked at instituting the increase. The money would go toward paying off a $1 million loan from 2013, used to upgrade the Cramer pump station; paying off a $100,000 loan used to buy a grinder for the pump station; and funding the installation of a sewage interceptor line to try and address overflows in the sewage system.

“With the condition that the (sewage) system is in, some work will need to be done,” councilman Stan Cheyne said. “So the question is: do we phase (a rate hike) in, or do we do it all now?”

Borough engineer Kevin Brett said that phasing in the increase means the hike will exceed $7.50 in the end, “because you’ll be catching up from the time when the ($7.50 rate hike) was not in place.”

Instituting the hike all at once, Brett said, would allow the borough to pay off the pump station and grinder loans before they begin work on the interceptor line.

Discussion of a future rate hike will be back on council’s agenda in February.


Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, pvarine@tribweb.com or via Twitter @MurrysvilleStar.


Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, pvarine@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Murrysville
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.