ShareThis Page
Fracking back on Murrysville’s agenda in the coming weeks |

Fracking back on Murrysville’s agenda in the coming weeks

Patrick Varine
Artwork submitted by Huntley & Huntley
Above, a site plan map for the proposed Titan well pad off Bollinger Road in Murrysville.

Two of Murrysville’s board and commissions will have fracking issues back on the agenda in the coming weeks, beginning Tuesday night.

The Murrysville Planning Commission will host a 7 p.m. public workshop on the Titan well pad application, proposed by Canonsburg driller Huntley & Huntley.

The Titan well pad is proposed for a 71-acre parcel off of Bollinger Road, although work would only take place on nine acres of the property, according to the land development application filed in October.

For more, including the full land-development and conditional use-applications, see

In addition to the well pad workshop, the citizen group Murrysville Watch Committee, which recently incorporated as a nonprofit, will continue its challenge of Murrysville’s fracking ordinance later this month.

The Murrysville Zoning Hearing Board will continue hearing the committee’s validity challenge of the fracking ordinance at 7 p.m. Jan. 24.

Both meetings will be held in the council chambers of the Murrysville municipal building at 4100 Sardis Road.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, or via Twitter @MurrysvilleStar.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Murrysville
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.