Franklin Regional board may change grading scale, broaden range | TribLIVE.com
Murrysville

Franklin Regional board may change grading scale, broaden range

Patrick Varine
1125748_web1_web-school
Tribune-Review file
1125748_web1_WEB-franklinregional-schoolboard
Tribune-Review file
Above, the Franklin Regional school board.

Franklin Regional school director Paul Scheinert hoped students were benefiting from having a more rigorous grading system where “A” grades (the district uses a plus/minus system as well) range from 92 to 100%, “B” grades range from 82 to 91% and so on.

But seeking to give students a more-level playing field when it comes to college admissions scrutiny, administrators are proposing changing to a “base 10” system, which would mean an “A” is 90 to 100%, a “B” is 80 to 89% and so on.

“I believe this change is long overdue,” high school Principal Ron Suvak said. “I believe it will help our kids explore areas of academic passion and not worry about a point or two in a class.”

Scheinert was initially concerned that the change meant the district was “relaxing the (grading) standard.”

“My opinion is that if an A is 92 or higher, and it becomes 90 or higher, we’ve relaxed the standard,” Scheinert said. “And I’d fight to maintain it if I thought it was doing us some benefit. But what I’ve heard is that it does us no benefit.”

For school board member and curriculum committee chair Jane Tower, changing the scale does not lower any standards.

“For me, the major reason was, we don’t want our kids to have ‘tunnel vision’ and be so focused on science or whatever, but not on ‘soft skills,’ ” she said. “We hear about the ‘almighty GPA’ and about students who might not take a particular course because it might affect the ‘almighty GPA’ and their class ranking.

“Giving them an opportunity to take that class without worrying about its effect on their GPA is what sold me on this.”

Board President Dr. Larry Borland agreed.

“It isn’t a relaxing of the standards, it’s making the standards more consistent,” Borland said. “I really don’t want to see kids who are completely focused and driven to have a high GPA take courses just to increase a number. That’s not the goal for our education.”

Suvak said what the district is proposing “is far more in line with what the majority of high schools report.”

For William Barnes, assistant dean of admissions at Saint Vincent College, the quality of a school’s curriculum is more important than what grading system they may use.

“There isn’t one standard transcript across the board. Every one is different,” Barnes said. “So you look at a variety of things. You have a district like Franklin Regional, which is one of the highest ranked in the region. So we look at the quality of the curriculum and the coursework.”

Barnes said many districts still use the system Franklin Regional employs.

“Some districts are even more restrictive. Their ‘A’ starts at 93 percent,” he said. “Others don’t tell us what their system is at all — we only get the percentage.”

Brett Freshour, vice president for enrollment management at Seton Hill University, agreed.

“As we’re making admission decisions, the main thing we’re trying to determine is: based on a student’s body of work, can they be successful? I don’t think (changing a grading system) will affect it that much,” Freshour said.

Assistant Superintendent Mary Catherine Reljac said changing the percentage range for grades will not change teachers’ expectations for students or course rigor in general.

“The grades are nebulous in that respect,” Reljac said. “We hope that by doing this, we’re not changing academically, we’re just helping our students to better compete with others in the academic realm.”

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.