ShareThis Page
Franklin Regional school board expected to award Sloan project bids next week |

Franklin Regional school board expected to award Sloan project bids next week

Patrick Varine
| Thursday, February 14, 2019 1:30 a.m

FR vid

Franklin Regional school board officials are expected to award bids Monday night for a project that will see the renovation of Sloan Elementary School and the construction of a second elementary building on the Sloan property, off Sardis Road in Murrysville.

Bids were opened on Feb. 12 for the project, which school district officials estimated will cost about $54 million.

Despite being approved in October by Murrysville council, the project is the subject of legal action: a group of private residents, the Sloan Project Concerned Citizens, have appealed council’s approval, arguing that officials did not set appropriate conditions to protect the health, welfare and safety of the community.

The school district has also intervened in the appeal. Its position is that Murrysville officials went too far and overstepped their authority in imposing some of the conditions required for approval.

A court date for the appeal has not been set. The school board will meet at 7:30 p.m., Feb. 18, in the Murrysville municipal building at 4100 Sardis Road. Meetings are also broadcast live on Comcast local acces Channel 19.

Above, see a video on the history of the project.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, or via Twitter .

Tribune-Review file
A group called "Sloan Project Concerned Citizens" has appealed the approval of the Franklin Regional School District’s Sloan "elementary campus" project.
Tribune-Review file
Above, an architectural rendering of the renovated Sloan Elementary School.
Categories: Local | Murrysville
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.