Murrysville-area emergency services receive $50K in state funding |

Murrysville-area emergency services receive $50K in state funding

Patrick Varine
Tribune-Review file
Above, a Murrysville Medic One diver searches a pond in Henry Clay Township, Fayette County, where a pick-up truck had gone into the water and the driver was missing.

Freshman State Rep. Bob Brooks, R-Murrysville, announced last week more than $50,000 in state funding for Murrysville-area emergency responders, part of $188,000 in overall funding for his 54th District.

“Our firefighters and EMS personnel work tirelessly day in and day out to protect us,” Brooks said. “This state grant program helps to relieve some of the financial burden they face and allows them to continue providing their life-saving services to our communities.”

The funding includes $14,151 for Sardis VFC No. 1, $13,162 for Murrysville VFC No. 1, $12,007 for White Valley VFD, $11,512 for Murrysville Medic Fire Company No. 1 and $7,155 for Murrysville Medic One EMS.

Additional funding will go to fire companies and EMS services in Fawn Township, Harrison Hills, West Deer, Lower Burrell and Markle.

Grant money comes from state gaming proceeds, and can be used to build, repair or renovate a department or service’s primary building; to purchase equipment; to participate in training; or to pay down an organization’s debt service.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Murrysville
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.