Murrysville council to take public comment on fracking well application | TribLIVE.com
Murrysville

Murrysville council to take public comment on fracking well application

Patrick Varine
1732237_web1_ms-FrackHrg2-062719
Ryan Dailey, with Civil & Environmental Consultants, is cross-examined by Protect P-T attorney Anton Berkovich during a public hearing before Murrysville council on Wednesday, June 19, 2019.

After four months of testimony from officials seeking to bring the first fracking well into Murrysville, residents will soon have a chance to give their opinions.

The public hearing for the Titan well pad, proposed by Huntley & Huntley Energy Exploration — which recently announced a name change to Olympus Energy — began in mid-June, with engineers and consultants detailing their plans for a 350-by-500-foot well pad on a 71-acre property off Bollinger Road in eastern Murrysville. The site is the former Kowalski strip mine, which was last active in the 1970s.

As the hearing has been continued over several meetings, drillers outlined plans for coordinating truck traffic to the site and citizen group Protect P-T, which was granted standing to participate in the hearing, brought in testimony from a medical advocacy coordinator with the anti-fracking group Physicians for Social Responsibility.

Murrysville council’s Oct. 2 meeting will see the continuation of the hearing and the first chance for the public to comment on Huntley & Huntley’s application, which is for the conditional-use permits the company must secure for the construction and operation of a fracking well.

The meeting is at 7 p.m. in the Murrysville municipal building, 4100 Sardis Road.

See the full meeting agenda at Murrysville.com.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Murrysville
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.