ShareThis Page
Murrysville council will vote on petition to redistrict voter precincts |

Murrysville council will vote on petition to redistrict voter precincts

Patrick Varine
Submitted photo
Above, the 2019 Murrysville Municipal Council. From the left, Carl Stepanovich, Tony Spadaro, Josh Lorenz, Loren Kase, Jamie Lee-Korns, Dayne Dice and Toni Brockway.

Murrysville council this week will consider lending its support for a petition to redistrict municipal voting precincts.

Long voting lines during the past two elections have caught municipal officials’ attention, and they are looking at working with the county to make some changes.

All seven of Murrysville’s precincts contain more than the state-recommended maximum of 1,200 voters. Some, like East Murrysville and Manordale, are only a couple hundred voters over. However the Sardis and Newlonsburg precincts both exceed 3,600, well beyond the figures allowable “without good cause shown,” according to state law.

A resolution supporting the petition is on council’s Jan. 16 agenda.

Countywide, 15 percent of Westmoreland voting precincts exceed the state’s recommendations.

Other items on council’s agenda include:

• Approval of a five-year agreement with the Murrysville police officers union.

• An ordinance granting West Penn Power an easement through Murrysville Community Park for installation of a transformer and underground electrical conduit.

• Presenting the 2018 Outstanding Achievement Award to municipal IT specialist Michael Hiler.

For the full agenda, see the Agenda Center at

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, or via Twitter @MurrysvilleStar.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Murrysville
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.