Some Delmont residents unhappy with hauling service |

Some Delmont residents unhappy with hauling service

Patrick Varine
Tribune-Review file
Republic Services’ hauling contract with Delmont has led to regular resident complaints at council meetings over the past year.

Topics vary at monthly Delmont council meetings, but one topic has come up fairly consistently over the past year or so: complaints about trash service, provided in the borough by Republic Services.

“Everything that we signed onto as part of this contract has gone away,” said resident Randy Otto, who asked borough officials to explore ways to seek release from the contract.

A year ago, Republic officials announced that they would no longer accept any other plastics for recycling other than those numbered 1 or 2, and also announced they would no longer accept glass as recycling.

This past April, a Republic official came to Delmont council asking for a 74-cent hike to customers’ bills, citing the equitable adjustment provision in its contract with the borough.

The moves came amid regular complaints from borough residents about missed pick-ups and general confusion about the state of hauling in Delmont. And with price hikes built into Republic’s contract, some borough residents wanted to know what they were getting for the additional money.

“We have been consistent in our service,” said Edward Jesus, general manager for Republic’s local hauling division. “We have the same driver on the same routes for consistency. There have been numerous road construction projects going on this year which sometimes creates a delay in servicing the customer, but we pick them up the next day once the streets open back up.”

For resident Kevin Bortz, the main issue is one of communication.

“Republic has not done a good job communicating the various changes to their process,” Bortz said. “News articles have been the main source of information, which only reaches a limited audience.”

Bortz said the company should find a way to communicate to residents when trash pick-up is delayed.

“I feel that if Republic better communicated what is going, they would have better optics, and they would be met with less resistance when it comes to asking for increases.”

Jesus said haulers ran into some confusion in servicing roads that are partially in Delmont and partially in Murrysville.

“We service Delmont on Fridays and some streets are part of Delmont and Murrysville, which is a different pick-up day,” he said. “This has been properly communicated now and we think the collection-day confusion is resolved.”

Councilman David Piper, one of the strongest borough proponents of the move to Republic, noted that even with price increases, Delmont residents are paying less than many did under the previous hauler, Waste Management, which serviced some, but not all, of the borough.

Piper also said that Republic had “major difficulties” with staffing, which led to missed pick-ups. Jesus disputed that notion.

“We are fully staffed and have been all year,” Jesus said.

Not everyone is unhappy with Republic.

“We use the tag system which is unbelievably cheap,” said Annamarie Stackiewicz. “Yes, there have been some issues with pick-up, however overall it’s a good deal.”

Councilman Bill Marx said the situation may not be ideal, but it is better than it was.

“Having a refuse carrier that offers recycling is important to a lot of people,” Marx said. “Yes, Republic has not been providing the service they offered and I feel that we should look into renegotiating their contract and seeing what refunds are due the residents of Delmont. But I don’t think going back to the days of everyone choosing their cousin’s trash-hauling service … is an option.”

Delmont’s current hauling contract with Republic is structured to expire in 2021, at the same time as Republic’s contract with Murrysville and Export. Borough officials would like to join those communities in negotiating the next contract as a group.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Murrysville
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.