McCandless council considering conflict-of-interest rules for appointed positions |
North Hills

McCandless council considering conflict-of-interest rules for appointed positions

Tony LaRussa

McCandless council is considering guidelines for people interested in serving on town boards, commissions and committees to make sure applicants do not profit from the appointments.

“I’ve received some complaints from people who are worried that certain people were applying for committees for personal gain,” council President Kim Zachary said at the Aug. 19 agenda meeting. “I’m not saying that this is even going on, but having something like this in place shows good intent.”

While applicants for volunteer posts are typically asked whether serving would result in a conflict of interest, the town has no policy in place to require such disclosures, Zachary said.

“We don’t have any standards to determine whether there is a conflict,” she said. “Maybe we should have some guidelines.”

If approved, the new conflict-of-interest provisions would be added to policy changes unanimously approved by council in 2016 that require openings for positions on boards, commissions and committees to be advertised for 30 days on the town website and in other publications.

The new appointment policy replaced the town’s long-standing practice of simply asking current members whose terms were scheduled to end if they wish to continue in the position, or tapping residents who previously expressed an interest in serving.

Several council members agreed that formal conflict-of-interest rules could be worth pursuing.

“People shouldn’t be profiting if they are making decisions,” said Councilman Steve Mertz.

Town officials suggested that a local conflict-of-interest policy could be modeled after similar state and county policies, or the ones used for lawyers and certified pubic accountants.

Councilman Bill McKim noted that elected officials are required to reveal their sources of income so “we can evaluate whether they give rise to any conflicts of interest.”

Zachary said enacting a local conflict-of-interest policy “seems like a good thing to have in place to be above reproach.”

She recommended that the new ethics rules approved by Ross Township officials last year, as well as policies used by other municipalities, be considered when McCandless creates its own policy.

“I don’t want these committees to be for people who think they are stepping-off points for financial gain,” she said. “I want them to be for true community servants.”

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | North Hills
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.