McCandless OKs final piece needed for Sheetz to start work on new Perry Highway store |
North Hills

McCandless OKs final piece needed for Sheetz to start work on new Perry Highway store

Tony LaRussa
This is an artists rendering of the new Sheetz that will be built along Perry Highway in McCandless across the street from the convenience store’s current location.

McCandless council has approved the final component the municipality requires before Sheetz can begin constructing a new gas station and convenience store across from its current location on Perry Highway.

Council on Monday voted unanimously to approve the sewer and stormwater engineering plans submitted for the project by the Altoona-based company.

Sheetz wants to move to the new location because there is not enough room at the current site to replace the structure with one of the larger stores the company typically builds.

The plan approved by council at its Sept. 24 council meeting already had the green light from the McCandless Township Sanitary Authority and the Allegheny County Sanitary Authority, said Bruce Betty, the town’s director of planning.

Site plans for the project as well as conditional use and subdivision plans also were previously approved by town council.

Once a permit is issued by the state Department of Transportation, the company “will start as soon as possible,” said Ryan Wotus, an attorney for Sheetz.

The actual start date could also be affected by weather conditions and the other sites the company is developing, Wotus said.

“The Sheetz in McCandless is on the front burner,” he said. “But that could change if work on other projects needs to be done first.”

Betty said while construction time can vary, the new Sheetz likely would take about six months to complete.

Even with most of the approvals needed to begin work, the project was stalled by a pair of lawsuits filed in the spring on behalf of residents in the surrounding neighborhood who oppose the move.

Property owners argued that a larger store closer to their homes will increase their exposure to gasoline and diesel fumes; add more noise, light and traffic congestion; make it more dangerous for children waiting for school buses;

lower their property values; and disturb the neighborhood’s tranquility.

To address those concerns, town planners are requiring the company take steps to reduce the impact on the neighborhood.

Despite meeting nearly all the requirements to proceed with its plans, the project was delayed in April by a pair of lawsuits filed on behalf of nearby residents.

Both court actions and their appeals were dismissed in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court, Wotus said.

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | North Hills
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.