New Ross law tweaked to set minimum distance from road for temporary signs | TribLIVE.com
North Hills

New Ross law tweaked to set minimum distance from road for temporary signs

Tony LaRussa
1127011_web1_nj-rossroadsigns-051619
TRIBUNE-REVIEW PHOTO
Temporary signs like these 2017 election placards will have to be a minimum of 3-feet from a roadway under a new rule created by Ross Township commissioners on May 6, 2019.

Ross commissioners have tweaked a new law that prohibits placing signs in public rights-of-way to define the minimum distance from the curb they can be erected.

In February the board voted unanimously to change the township’s zoning to outlaw the signs, which often are used to advertise political candidates, shows and community events.

The original measure that was approved classified the public right-of-way as the strip along a road between the curb and utility poles. But it did not define what the width of that space should be.

On Monday, the board agreed to require signs that are placed on public property be at least 3-feet from the curb or roadway.

Any sign placed inside the 3-foot area designated by the township will be removed by municipal employees. Repeat offenders will receive a warning and could face a fine of up to $300 for failing to adhere to the rules.

Officials warned that even if signs are place past 3-feet from the curb, they might still be illegal.

“Once you get past the 3-feet, the land is owned by somebody,” said Commissioner President Steve Korbel. “I advise people to be very careful about trespassing on private property to put up a sign.”

The law does not put any restrictions on placing signs on private property with permission of the owner.

The ordinance was enacted in response to complaints form residents who felt the proliferation of the temporary signs along township roads is an eyesore.

Township officials noted the law already was unanimously approved as a “pending ordinance,” which means even though some of the details of the zoning change still need to be worked out, the revision to the law took effect immediately.

Board members said the ordinance was purposely approved so it could be used in time to regulate the placement of political signs in public spaces for the May 21 primary.

A previous attempt to address the problem involved requiring people to pay a $100 deposit that would be refunded once the sign has been removed.

Officials said the deposit did little to reduce the number of signs placed and forgotten along the road.

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | North Hills
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.